I’ve been sitting here for the past hour watching the first four minutes of Selling The Faith on the TV over and over again, because I’m worried it has a “soap opera video” look to it.
I’ll apply a filter, render part of it, watch it out on the TV, then remove the filter from part of it, watch it to see if I can tell where the filter turns off, then turn it all the way off, see if it looks better, turn it back on… it’s obsessive.
Now that I think I’ve finally nailed down the first four minutes, I’ve moved on to the end credits. I feel like they scroll too “videoishly.” They don’t look like real credits. They look like credits I tacked on digitally with Final Cut.
Which is what I’ve done.
But I don’t want it to look like that.
It’s hard to explain.
This all goes back to a comment Adam made the other day. We were watching The Monitor Skit and he pointed out that it had a soap opera feel to it. He didn’t know exactly how it was manifested, it just did. I knew, though.
Here’s your video lesson.
Soap operas are shot on the cheap, written on the cheap, etc., etc. They are cheap to make because they have to be. They shoot so many episodes of soap operas, that if they were to shoot them on film, they’d go poor. So they shoot them on video. There is a difference that people don’t think about. See, film is an emulsion. It’s dyes and chemicals on substrate that react to light and produce pictures. Video, on the other hand, is, well, different. Video is generated using an analog sensor known as a charge-coupled device, or CCD. Photons of light hit the surface of the CCD, and the resultant energy is stored in a capacitor. Y’know what? Let’s skip the rest. Suffice it to say, video is NOT the same as film. Let’s do the easy breakdown.
Motion film is in strips. Each strip has “frames”. Each frame is a certain size. It’s measured in millimeters. You’ve heard 35mm film, 16mm film, 8mm film. That’s the size. A complete picture is contained in each frame. When you expose the frame to light, the chemicals on the substrate react and produce the image, which is different depending on how much light is getting to the frame, and how long you let the light hit the frame. This is called “exposure.” You can cut film up and splice it back together however you want. This is called editing. Film has no way to capture sound; it’s just strips of pictures. Motion film has to be developed just like regular film. If you rip open a shiny new roll of motion picture film to check it out, you just wasted it all — the same as with standard camera film.
Video is encoded magnetically onto a tape. It’s got nothing to do with being exposed to light. You can expose video tape to light all you want and it won’t be affected, unless you let it get all hot, in which case it’ll probably melt, because video tape is effing fragile. You can’t cut video tape up or you’ll ruin it. In addition to picture, there’s also sound. You can put sound on a video tape because it’s not just reacting to light, it’s actually data being magnetically encoded. Video can be recorded and then played back right away.
Film is shot and presented “progressively.” That is, each frame is its own image, and when the frame advances, the entire picture can change. Video isn’t usually like that. Video is usually what is known as “interlaced.” I say usually, because some types of video don’t work this way. Most do, though. Interlaced video means there are twice as many frames, but each one only has half of a picture. For example, you have a single frame of film that shows a complete picture. Now, if we take that same frame as interlaced video, it will only have half of the picture. The frame immediately following that one would have the second half of the picture. That’s called interlacing.
Film is usually shot and presented at 24 frames per second. That is, for one second of time that elapses, you have seen 24 separate and distinct pictures, collectively known as a “motion picture.” It’s called a motion picture because it’s a bunch of pictures that, when run together, show objects in motion, rather than a sequence of still pictures. Video is usually shot and presented at 60 interlaced frames per second. That means, for one second of time that elapses, you have seen 30 separate and distinct pictures, which were assembled from the 60 interlaced pictures that were actually stored.
Since the video is running much faster than the film, it looks “different.” It’s faster. Motion is more fluid, because there are more “in between” pictures to show all of that motion. Most people don’t know why video looks different, but they can notice the difference. Well, now you know. The difference is that video runs faster.
There’s obviously so many more differences, but that’s the primary one that sticks out for most people.
So I worry that people are going to watch my stuff, and say, that looks ridiculous. That looks like a soap opera. So I use filters to “fake” 24 frames per second, like film runs at.
It looks pretty good.
And that has been your video lesson for today.